I chose to focus my
guided inquiry on the question which pendulum will come to rest more quickly, a
lighter pendulum or a heavier pendulum?
To conduct this inquiry, I used three washers with different diameters:
1/2”, 1”, and 1.5”. Each washer also had
different masses. In addition to the
washers, I used a string, the arm of a document camera, and a 13” ruler. I tied the 1/2” washer to the string and tied
the string at a length of 9 inches to the arm of the document camera. Keeping the string pulled tight, I lifted the
washer to a height of 13 inches and dropped the washer. As soon as I dropped the washer, I started a
timer to keep track of the time it took for the washer to come to rest. I recorded the elapsed time in my
notebook. I repeated the procedure three
times and averaged the time it took for the washer to come to rest. I recorded the average time. I did the same thing with the other two washers
using the same string. I discovered the
1/2” washer came to rest quicker than the other two washers, and the 1” washer
came to rest quicker than the 1.5” washer.
The results were what I expected. The results confirmed the concept that “the greater the mass the greater
the inertia, or resistance to change in motion” (Tillery, Enger, & Ross,
2008, p. 41).
I faced some
challenges during my guided inquiry experience.
My biggest challenge was starting the timer at the same time I dropped
the washer. This proved to be more
difficult than I expected. I either hit
the start button right before or right after I released the washer rather than
simultaneously with the dropping of the washer.
Another challenge was ensuring I dropped the washers without adding more
force or twisting the washer on the string.
I attempted to solve this problem by balancing the washer on the ruler
and dropping the ruler to release the washer.
Using the ruler to drop the washer also caused challenges. There were instances when either the hole in
the center of the washer or the string caught on the ruler and disrupted the
flow of the first swing. When this
happened, I had to stop the washer and start again. Time became a challenge due to starting,
stopping, and restarting the initial dropping of the washer. What should have
been only three sets of three timings for the original activity turned into
many more attempts in order to obtain an accurate time. Even more attempts were necessary when I
added the different lengths of string for the second activity.
No comments:
Post a Comment